Submission
Instructions to Authors
Authors are requested to follow the guidelines below before submitting their papers:
- Each paper can have a maximum of 6 authors.
- Author names and affiliations must be entered during submission in the CMT portal and cannot be changed later.
- The list of authors in the paper must exactly match the author details provided in CMT.
- All correspondence will be sent to all listed authors; therefore, ensure that all email addresses entered in CMT are correct and active.
- All authors are required to sign the copyright form.
- Each paper must include a brief author contribution statement.
- Papers must be at least 5 pages, excluding references.
- Figures and images must have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi.
- Each paper must include a minimum of 15 references.
- Only Scopus-indexed papers should be cited in the references.
- Self-citations are not allowed. Papers containing self-citations will be rejected.
- All submitted manuscripts must have a similarity index below 20%, excluding references. Papers exceeding this limit will be desk-rejected.
- The use of AI-generated text, figures, tables, or code is strictly prohibited. Authors must ensure 0% AI-generated content in their manuscripts.
Authors who do not comply with the above guidelines may face desk rejection prior to peer review.
Authors are strongly recommended to use the MS Word template. The conference proceedings are planned to be published with E3S Web of Conferences.
Template: MS Word
Submission Link: Microsoft CMT
The Microsoft CMT service is used for managing the peer-review process for this conference. This service is provided free of charge by Microsoft, including all expenses related to Azure cloud services, software development, and technical support.
Authors must register their email address with CMT to submit papers to E3vision 2026. Instructions for creating a CMT account are available at the submission portal.
Paper Submission & Review Policy
Authors are advised to submit original and unpublished work relevant to the conference theme.
The review process evaluates both the quality of writing and the scientific and technical impact of the work. Authors should clearly define the research problem, explain their contributions, justify the novelty of the work, and appropriately position it with respect to the state of the art. The Program Committee encourages submissions that present strong technical arguments supported by meaningful results.
Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is treated as serious professional misconduct. All submissions will be screened for plagiarism, and papers showing significant overlap with previously published or submitted work will be rejected.
Submission Guidelines
Regular Paper (8–15 pages):
Authors are invited to submit original and unpublished research papers aligned with the conference themes. Each submission should clearly identify the research problem, highlight the novelty and significance of the contribution, describe the methodology and experimental or theoretical framework, and compare the proposed approach with existing state-of-the-art techniques. Results should be presented clearly using appropriate figures, tables, and discussions, followed by well-structured conclusions outlining key findings, implications, and potential future research directions.
All submissions must strictly follow the formatting guidelines and instructions provided in the official conference template.
Important Note
Regardless of the submission type, authors are strongly advised to submit only original and unpublished work relevant to the conference themes.